“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Front Page » Medicine » Children » How Doctors Talk to Patients Impacts HPV Vaccination Rates
Children
Text size:

How Doctors Talk to Patients Impacts HPV Vaccination Rates

Story Highlights

  • A recent study analyzed how doctors communicate with their patients about the HPV vaccine.
  • The study authors concluded doctors are not effectively promoting HPV vaccine to increase use by adolescents.
  • The study does not address issues of public concern regarding the safety of the HPV vaccine; need for informed consent and conflicts of interest between vaccine researchers and the pharmaceutical industry.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in the United States continues to remain low in comparison to other adolescent vaccinations1 2—approximately 38% of adolescent girls and 14% of adolescent boys complete the entire three-doses of HPV vaccine.2 As identified by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a key strategy in increasing HPV vaccination coverage is to modify the manner in which healthcare providers communicate information about the vaccine to parents.2 

As a result, the CDC has introduced a national campaign, “You Are the Key” to coach vaccine providers on how to successfully recommend the HPV vaccine in order to increase vaccine use by adolescents targeted by the CDC.2 3 

In response to the government’s efforts to raise HPV vaccination rates, a study published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention assess the communication methods used by primary care physicians and pediatricians in recommending the HPV vaccine. The study also evaluates whether communication methods used by healthcare providers are consistent with the five communication practices outlined by the CDC to ensure adolescent patients are fully vaccinated.2 4 

With an overarching goal to “to inform efforts to target interventions to the specific communication practices and provider populations that could benefit most,”2  the study’s findings conclude that many primary care physicians and pediatricians are not effectively communicating the importance of the HPV vaccination to parents of adolescents.2 5 

The findings highlight the following communication patterns:

• 59% of physicians only recommend the HPV vaccine to those patients believe to be “at risk”5
• 26% and 39% do not provide timely HPV vaccination recommendations for girls and boys, respectively5
• 27% do not strongly endorse the HPV vaccine5
• 44% do not recommend same-day HPV vaccination at the time of visit5

An author of the study, Melissa B. Gilkey, PhD, assistant professor of population medicine at Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute in Boston, reports:

Physicians have a lot of influence on whether adolescents receive the HPV vaccine. Our findings suggest that physicians can improve their recommendations in three ways: by recommending HPV vaccination for all 11- to 12-year-olds and not just those who appear to be at risk; by saying the HPV vaccine is very important; and by suggesting vaccination on the day of the visit rather than at a later date.5 

The implications of the study raise broader contextual issues reflecting public concerns about the safety of the HPV vaccine, informed consent and conflict of interest.

International Investigations on the Safety of the HPV Vaccine

The HPV vaccine has been entangled in controversy from the very beginning when it was fast tracked to licensure in the U.S. in 2006.6  Over the last few years, numerous reports of young girls experiencing adverse effects after receiving the vaccine has resulted in several countries calling investigations into the safety of vaccine.7 

• In July of this year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) launched an investigation into the safety of three HPV vaccines after reports of severe reactions.
• In 2014, similar reports of reactions to the vaccine prompted Columbian Inspector General, Alejandro Ordoñez, to ask “the Columbian National Institutes of Health to disclose the technical and scientific studies relating to HPV vaccine safety and approval for use in Colombia along with all details regarding the guidelines for the management of Gardasil doses from manufacture through administration.”8 
• In 2013, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare publically announced that it had decided to withdraw its recommendation for the HPV vaccine after recipients reported devastating side effects.

The irony here is that while the international community is raising important questions regarding vaccine safety, ethics and informed consent, public health officials in the United States continue to turn a blind eye to this matter.7  What is even more unsettling is that studies such as this one not only disregard these issues entirely but many  study authors also strongly endorse use of HPV vaccine. It is quite apparent that the recent study examining communication techniques used by HPV vaccine providers carries an underlying message strongly promoting adolescent use of the HPV vaccine by claiming that it has “an excellent safety profile”2  and that there exists “mounting evidence of effectiveness.”2 

Attributing physician attitudes and poor communication as evidence of “missed opportunity” to increase HPV vaccination rates seems like a rather rigid outlook when analyzing the issue in a larger context.2  Could it possibly be that HPV vaccine coverage rates are low due to serious, adverse reactions experienced by vaccine recipients and reported in VAERS? Could be it possibly be due to the fact that a number of countries are calling for probes into the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine and that some have gone as far as withdrawing HPV vaccine recommendations?

The Implications for Informed Consent

The right to informed consent to accepting or refusing a medical intervention is a human right.9  Since vaccination is a medical intervention that involves use of a pharmaceutical products that carries the risk of potential injury, everyone has the right to become fully informed and educated about the risks associated with the vaccine prior to making a decision about receiving it.9 

The recommendations provided in this study calling on doctors to improve HPV vaccine rates among adolescent patients carries an underlying implication that presents an interesting paradox with regard to doctors adhering to the ethical principle of informed consent. For instance, the study found that…

On urgency, about half of physicians reported recommending HPV vaccination for a later visit or giving a choice about when to vaccinate, rather than recommending same-day vaccination for patients in the target age range. These deficiencies in recommendation timeliness and urgency likely lead to avoidable delays in vaccination, thereby contributing to under-immunization among younger adolescents.2 

Furthermore, the authors state that HPV vaccine recommendation…

quality was higher among physicians who began conversations about HPV vaccine by saying that the child was due versus giving information or eliciting questions. This approach may correspond with a more directive, or “presumptive,” communication style that research in early childhood vaccination suggests is associated with higher vaccine acceptance when compared with an open-ended, “participatory” style.2 

The implication here is that physicians must use authoritarian styles of communication when recommending the vaccine. It discourages them from using open-ended, two-way methods of communication with parents but instead encourages directive, one-way communication when recommending the vaccine. Doesn’t this conflict with providing patients with the right to informed consent?

Conflicts of Interest

Financial interests between academic researchers and industry are becoming all too common particularly with pharmaceutical companies. Conflict of interest disclosure for this study states:

This work was funded via an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer (to N.T. Brewer)… N.T. Brewer reports receiving commercial research grants from Merck, Pfizer, and GSK, received speaker honoraria from Merck, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Merck. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.2 

Two of the pharmaceuticals mentioned above manufacture HPV vaccines—Merck manufactures Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) produces Cervarix.

We know that Big Pharma does not just throw away its money. By no means did this highly profitable business gain its success by donating funds and certainly not to people that threaten its interests. Can we trust the legitimacy and credibility of this study in light of Dr. Noel Brewer’s strong financial ties to Merck and GSK?


References:

1 National Cancer Institute. President’s Cancer Panel Annual Report. Accelerating HPV vaccine uptake urgency for action to prevent cancer. A report to the President of the United States from the President’s Cancer Panel. National Institutes of Health 2014.
2 Gilkey M, Malo T, Shah P, Hall M, Brewer N. Quality of Physician Communication about Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Findings From A National Survey. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2015; 24(11): 1-7.
3 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. You Are The Key to HPV Cancer Prevention. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Feb. 28, 2014.
4 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preteen and Teen Vaccines: What Can You Do To Ensure that Your Patients Get Fully Vaccinated? National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Oct. 7, 2015.
5 The American Association for Cancer Research. Many U.S. Physicians Communicate With Parents in Ways That May Discourage HPV Vaccination. News Release Oct. 22, 2015.
6 National Vaccine Information Center. Merck’s Gardasil Vaccine Not Proven Safe for Little Girls: NVIC Criticizes FDA for Fast Tracking Licensure. NVIC June 27, 2006.
7 Jaxen J. Nearly Half of the Doctors in the U.S. Not Routinely Recommending the HPV VaccineHealth Impact News Nov. 6, 2015.
8 Erickson N. HPV Vaccine Controversy in Columbia ContinuesInfoWars Jan. 12, 2015.
9 National Vaccine Information Center. Informed Consent. National Vaccine Information Center.

5 Responses to How Doctors Talk to Patients Impacts HPV Vaccination Rates

  1. reyes Reply

    January 5, 2016 at 8:34 pm

    I has suffered for Human papillomavirus HPV) for 2years, I was given some tablets at the hospital but I refused to take it, They said I have to be on it for life so I don’t want take a drugs everyday for life. No point in taking medicine everyday when u won’t get cure from it and I was advice to seek for natural herbal cure, after some time I found dr galiga is the most trustful herbalist that have herbs to cure wicked symptom’s,I emailed dr galiga, for 2weeks been his patient he cured my (HPV) with his herbal. I only used his natural herbs for two weeks it was 100% cure. I’m not (HPV) patient anymore. I’m happy about it i finally got cured out of this mess been in my body for 2years. I also recommend you if you’re living with (HPV) or herpes symptoms i also want you to be free contact dr galiga with the email attach to my post. drgaligaherbalcenter@gmail.com

  2. Donna Marquart Reply

    November 25, 2015 at 2:42 pm

    I have heard and read that cervical cancer is curable at all 4 stages – Curable. So why would doctors even suggest it unless they are making money off of it or are misguided by their controllers. I’m aware that Gardasil was fast tracked and never tested with a placebo. (a placebo that does not contain aluminum or other heavy metals and oils etc.etc)

  3. Sandy Lunoe Reply

    November 25, 2015 at 2:20 am

    GARDASIL AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

    The majority of these factors have still not been satisfactorily addressed:

    Whether the vaccine prevents cervical cancer;
    necessity for boosters;
    increased risk of cancer due to: ingredients, replacement and aluminium bound recombinant HPV DNA;
    if vaccinated may donate blood without serious health consequences for recipients; autoimmune disorders (80+, which may occur up to years after vaccination);
    if cervical cancer is caused by HPV or if there must be additional or other factors for this to occur;
    if HPV is necessarily an infection only transmitted by sexual intercourse;
    genotoxicity;
    whether the vaccine targets the relevant virus strains in different demographics;
    change of strains in time;
    adverse events due to concomitant administration with other vaccines;
    true numbers of serious adverse events including long term;
    results if a true placebo had been used in clinical trials; results of clinical trials if the manufacturer had not used own exclusion criteria;
    blood clots with or without hormonal contraceptives; brain damage;
    consequences of age bridging in the trials;
    toxicity of ingredients;
    infertility, miscarriages, stillbirths, congenital anomalies;
    excretion in breast milk;
    destabilization of the hormonal balance;
    aluminium safety;
    genetic predisposition to injected aluminium;
    complete list of ingredients including those protected by trade secrets;
    variability of batches;
    manipulation of clinical trials;
    conflicts of interest;
    whether the claimed benefits outweigh potential risks; etc

  4. Skye Reply

    November 24, 2015 at 2:05 pm

    I was 18 when my doctor basically forced the HPV vaccine on me. It was my first time seeing a “grown up” doctor instead of my pediatrician. He basically said you need this vaccine and next thing you know I’m in the lab and their are sticking me with the needle. I didn’t go back for the last two of the series because the whole thing just seemed off to me. I felt very uncomfortable with how I was basically forced into getting the vaccine without any discussion.

  5. Bev Pattenden Reply

    November 19, 2015 at 7:19 pm

    We have had enough of the lies about the safety of vaccines. They are not safe and never have been. Anyone who does proper research can find that out in a few hours, and yet we have the brain washed, “conditioned” masses following the lies from those who benefit financially from the continuations and expansion of vaccines. In the process countries are going bankrupt trying to keep up with the increases planned in the “Decade of Vaccines 2010-2020″ by the World Health Organisation, unelected and unaccountable for their insane agenda to have everything on the face of the earth vaccinated, and then micro-chipped.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>