“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Front Page » Medicine » Children » Unraveling the Mystery of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death
Children
Text size:

Unraveling the Mystery of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death

baby's handStory Highlights
  • Some 3,500 infants in the U.S. died of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) in 2013.
  • Many health authorities maintain that vaccination is not linked to SIDS.
  • There appears to be a significant correlation between the number of vaccine doses given to infants under age one and infant mortality rates.

There are five main causes for infant mortality: birth defects, maternal health complications, unintentional injuries, preterm-related causes of death, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). It is particularly with SIDS, however, that many questions persist and remain unanswered. SIDS is defined as “infant deaths that cannot be explained after a thorough case investigation, including a scene investigation, autopsy, and review of the clinical history.”1

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that in 2013 there were 3,434 infant deaths classified under the umbrella term Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID), which includes SIDS (44%), Unknown Cause (31%), and Accidental Suffocation and Strangulation in Bed (25%).2 3 That represents a lot of babies dying for “unknown” reasons and begs for clarification. Government health officials have stated, “We don’t know exactly what causes SIDS at this time,” but allege that research suggests, “infants who die from SIDS are born with brain abnormalities or defects.” However, health officials give no explanation for why that may be true and, additionally, admit that genetic “defects” are not the whole picture when it comes to sudden unexpected and unexplained deaths of infants under one year of age.4

The Triple-Risk-Model

One of the most widely accepted hypotheses for the cause or causes of SIDS is the Triple-Risk Model, which holds that three conditions must be met to cause a previously healthy infant to suddenly die. First, the child must be a “vulnerable infant,” with an “underlying defect or brain abnormality that makes the baby less likely to survive. In the Triple-Risk Model, the theory is that certain factors—such as defects in the parts of the brain that control respiration or heart rate or genetic mutations—confer vulnerability.

A number of researchers have proposed that SIDS “may reflect a delayed development of arousal or cardiorespiratory control.” The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) reports that “certain infants, for reasons yet to be determined, may have a maldevelopment or delay in maturation of [a particular region of the brain], which would affect its function and connectivity to regions regulating arousal.”5

The second condition in the Triple-Risk Model theory refers to the “critical developmental period,” for SIDS, with particular focus on the first six months of the infant’s life, when critical changes in growth and development of the immune, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems are taking place. Most SUIDS occur within those first six months of life.

The final piece of the puzzle is “outside stressors,” such as stomach sleeping, overheated environment, respiratory infection, or exposure to cigarette smoke.1 Although vaccination is not openly recognized by the AAP or other medical trade associations or public health officials as a potential “outside stressor,” certainly exposure to injected toxins would be expected to provide a significant stressor for a newborn infant.

Vaccination Has Long Been a Suspect in SIDS

There have been reports of unexplained sudden deaths of infants throughout history, but so-called ‘Crib Death,’ now referred to as SIDS, was so uncommon it was not even mentioned in statistics pertaining to infant mortality until the 1960s. Increases in “crib deaths” or SIDS correlated with a shift in the U.S. vaccine schedule from public health officials recommending one vaccine be given at a time to recommending that multiple doses of vaccines be administered simultaneously to an infant.8

Several vaccine-related factors have been suggested as playing a role in the unexpected death of babies in the first year of life. One is the stimulation of an inflammatory immune response in infants when doctors administer combination vaccines that include multiple antigens for more than one disease, such as the DTaP-HepB-IPV shot containing antigens for diphtheria, tetanus ,pertussis, hepatitis B and polio.9

Citing multiple studies and research showing a direct correlation between infant mortality and the number of vaccines given to newborns, Kelly Brogan, MD, said:

Given the number of ‘antigenic’ exposures in vaccines, singularly, and in multi-dose form, the number of possible immunological reactions in newborns is simply mind-blowing—especially considering just how little we know about the immune system, the developing brain and infant physiology.7

Analysis of the relationship between the early childhood vaccination schedule and Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in the United States, when compared to that of 34 nations with lower IMRs than ours, reveals a “high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.”8 IMR researchers note:

Nations differ in their immunization requirements for infants aged less than 1 year. In 2009, five of the 34 nations with the best IMRs required 12 vaccine doses, the least amount, while the U.S. 26 vaccine doses, the most of any nation… A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs is essential.8

In the meantime, the CDC has concluded:

Babies receive many vaccines when they are between 2 to 4 months old. This age range is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), or infant death that cannot be explained. The timing of the 2 month and 4 month shots and SIDS has led some people to question whether they might be related. However, studies have found that vaccines do not cause and are not linked to SIDS.10

The Back to Sleep Campaign

Beginning in 1992, the AAP launched a “Back to Sleep” campaign to address the large numbers of reported SIDS cases in the U.S.  The AAP maintained that infants should sleep on their back, rather than their stomach or side as had been the standard in the U.S. before then. With the introduction of that program, reported SIDS-related deaths decreased by more than 40% throughout the 1990s. However, it has since leveled off and remains the leading cause of infant death beyond the one month neonatal period.5

Updating its original guidelines on back sleeping for babies, the AAP guidelines now include other suggestions to help protect an infant from SIDS in the first year of life, all aimed at modifying recognized risk factors. Since a number of SUIDs are related to accidental suffocation, it is recommended that soft sleep surfaces, loose bedding, stuffed toys and crib bumpers be avoided. Other increased risk factors listed by the AAP include overheating, maternal smoking, bed sharing, young maternal age, and preterm birth or low birth weight.5

A recent report from the journal Pediatrics suggested that after a certain point of development, swaddling, the traditional practice of firmly wrapping an infant to help reduce spontaneous startling and promote more peaceful sleep, may increase the risk of SIDS, particularly with stomach- or side-sleeping position. The risk was found to be highest in babies over age 6 months, and the researchers cited recommendations that swaddling should be discontinued once an infant is attempting to roll over and certainly by 6 months of age.11

Mirroring the CDC’s position that, “vaccines do not cause and are not linked to SIDS,” the AAP also recommends that babies receive all recommended vaccines on schedule.

While that public view—shared by government agencies and medical trade associations—has been that vaccination plays no role in SUID, many parents whose healthy infants died shortly after being given multiple vaccines do not share that view.


References:

1 National Institutes of Health. Research on Possible Causes of SIDS. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Oct. 29, 2015.
2 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sudden Unexpected Infant Death and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. CDC.gov Feb. 8, 2016.
3 CDC. Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID). CDC.gov Mar. 28, 2016.
4 
NIH. Safe to Sleep: What Causes SIDS? Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Oct. 29, 2015.
5 
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force. Changing Concepts of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Implications for Infant Sleeping Environment and Sleep Position.  
6 
Matturri L, et al. Sudden Infant Death Following Hexavalent Vaccination: A Neuropathologic Study. Vol. 21, Issue 7, 2016.
7 Brogan K. Could this be Driving the Epidemic of Sudden Infant Death (SIDS)? July 2014.
8 
Miller NZ, Goldman GS. Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Hum Exp Toxicol September 2011.
9 
CDC. Combination Vaccines. CDC April 2014.
10 
CDC. Vaccine Safety: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). CDC.gov Aug. 28, 2015.
11 Pease AS et al. Swaddling and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics May 2016.

29 Responses to Unraveling the Mystery of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death

  1. kddlporter Reply

    June 4, 2016 at 4:01 pm

    http://whale.to/vaccines/cot_death.html

    COT DEATHS LINKED TO VACCINATIONS

    by Dr Viera Scheibner, Ph.D (Principal Research Scientist, Retired) & Leif Karlsson. 1991

    COTWATCH: THE FIRST TRUE INFANT BREATHING MONITOR
    STRESS INDUCED BREATHING PATTERNS DISCOVERED BY COTWATCH
    FOREWARNING OF COT DEATH OVERLOOKED
    VACCINATION – A MAJOR STRESS
    HARMFUL VACCINE INGREDIENTS
    MANY DOCTORS DO NOT VACCINATE THEIR OWN CHILDREN!
    SUCCESSION OF HARMFUL MEDICAL PROCEDURES

    Although vaccination is undoubtedly the single biggest and most preventable cause of cot-death, it is not the only one. If we write too much about vaccination, we would inevitably create an impression that we think vaccines are the only cause of cot death. The key words in cot death are Non-Specific Stress Syndrome. This is the underlying mechanism of all cot deaths and it explains all pathological and clinical observations.

    Cot Death is the single biggest cause of death in infants from about four weeks to six months of age, with another peak at about 9 months in industrially developed countries. It gets a lot of media exposure and people are successfully asked to dip into their pockets and contribute to cot death research. This has been going on for some twenty years now and yet cot death remains a “mystery which may never be resolved”.

    Perhaps the time has come for the doctors and the public to start asking some relevant questions, such as why, with so much money poured into research, cot death is still officially presented as that famous ‘mystery’ and more and more money is ‘needed’ to resolve it in ‘years to come’.

    COTWATCH: THE FIRST TRUE INFANT BREATHING MONITOR

    Some 4.5 years ago, my husband Leif Karlsson, a biomedical engineer specialising in patient monitoring Systems, and myself, a retired Principal Research Scientist, were looking for a paediatrician willing to undertake proper research with our Cotwatch Breathing Monitor. The emphasis with this equipment is on ‘breathing’ because most, if not all of the machines used to monitor babies’ breathing in their homes are not breathing monitors – they are “motion monitors” where any movement is taken as breathing. After one particular meeting, where our demonstration of marked differences between the level of alarms in near miss and new born babies fell on the deaf ears of cot death ‘researchers’, we looked at each other and said with one breath: “Let’s do a damn good job of this research ourselves”.

    Leif spent one and a half years developing a microprocessor-based Cotwatch. With this equipment you don’t have to rely on records of alarms; you get computer printouts of the longitudinal record of a baby’s breathing. You can’t have more objective information than that.

    STRESS INDUCED BREATHING PATTERNS DISCOVERED BY COTWATCH

    Our records confirmed the existence of a Stress-Induced Breathing Pattern, which is a low-volume breathing (5-10% of the volume of normal unstressed breathing), occurring in clusters (3-6 shorter episodes within 10-15 minutes) when a child is incubating illness or teething or following “insults”, such as exposure to cigarette smoke, fatigue, over handling by visitors, or vaccination needles. Numerous causes, but the same reaction. Many years ago, a Canadian medical doctor, Dr Hans Selye, became particularly interested in the well-known fact that for a number of days before patients develop symptoms of specific illness, which can be diagnosed, they always show signs of a non-specific nature which are common to many or possibly all diseases. When he in-injected extracts of tissues, or a great variety of noxious substances into rats, he observed the following signs of organ damage: spot-like bleeding into lungs and thymus, shrunken thymus and all lymphatic structures, enlarged adrenal cortex, ulceration of the gastro-intestinal tract, derangements in body creased or control, viscosity of the blood, disappearance of eosinophils (white blood cells) from blood, etc.

    He concluded that he was looking at a universal reaction of organisms to any noxious substance. He also connected the results of his experiments with his earlier observations of patients with non-specific symptoms of the initial stages of any illness.

    Seyle also concluded that the Non-Specific Stress (or General Adaptation) Syndrome has three stages: the alarm stage when the body is under acute attack and mobilises all its defences; the stage of adaptation or resistance, when it seems to relax and seemingly accepts the intruding noxious substance; and the stage of exhaustion, when the body again tries to rid itself of the intruder. Death may occur in any of the three stages.

    FOREWARNING OF COT DEATH OVERLOOKED

    What does all this have to do with cot death and breathing?

    Similarly to what Dr Selye found with noxious substances, there are many interesting and consistent tell-tale signs that forewarn of impending cot death.

    The definition of Cot Death is: “The sudden death of any infant or a young child, which is unexpected by history, and in which a thorough port-mortem examination fails to demonstrate an adequate cause of death”. (Byard,1991)

    Cot death is a very well-defined pathological entity and all babies who succumb to it have the same post mortem findings. These are: petechiated lungs, thymus and sometimes also pericardium (spot like haemorrhaging on surface); shrunken thymus and lymphatic structures; signs of increased adreno-cortical activity; signs of ulceration of the gastro-intestinal tract (reflux); many babies have low viscosity blood; up to 90% of babies who succumb to cot death have a number of non-specific symptoms for up to three weeks before death, such as runny nose, coated tongue, sticky eyes, otitis media, enlarged tonsils, spleen and liver, rash, a variety of upper respiratory tract infections, and loss of body weight to rnention just a few.

    These are all symptoms of the Non-Specific Stress Syndrome as defined by Dr Selye.. Those people involved in Cot Death management all over the world know about these symptoms, but they usually play them down as unimportant and insufficient to cause death in an infant. None of them has connected these well-known symptoms associated with cot death, with the Non-Specific Stress syndrome. Perhaps for their sake this is just as well, because they would have been unable to prove the validity of this connection in the absence of adequate means to demonstrate it in the infant’s breathing pattern.

    So where does vaccination come into the problem of Cot Death?

    VACCINATION – A MAJOR STRESS

    Initially we did not know about the controversy surrounding vaccination. We merely observed that vaccination was the single greatest cause of stress in small babies, as indicated by the standard Cotwatch equipment, and also the single greatest factor preceding cot death in a large number of cases. We concluded that the timing of 80% of the cot deaths occurring between the second and sixth months is due to the cumulative effect of infections, timing of immunisations and some inherent specifics in the baby’s early development.

    We started yet another search for more information. Soon we discovered a wealth of it in medical journals like The Lancet concerning not only the ineffectiveness of vaccines in preventing children from contracting infectious diseases, but also on adverse effects of various vaccines, including death. Regarding the former aspect, we found numerous reports that vaccinated and non-vaccinated children contract the relevant infectious disease at approximately the same rate, or that vaccinated children are even more susceptible to the infectious diseases.

    Inevitably, we began recording breathing patterns of babies after vaccination. The results of these recordings were presented to the 2nd Immunisation Conference, held in Canberra, 27~29th May 1991. We demonstrated that microprocessor records of babies’ breathing after DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) injections reveal a pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing closely following the dynamics of adreno-cortical activity in an individual under stress and as observed by Dr Selye.

    We also demonstrated that flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing in babies after administration of the DPT vaccine occur characteristically on certain days even though the amplitude of the flare-ups varies from child to child.

    For seventy babies who succumbed to cot death, although babies could die on any day after DPT injection, there were significantly more deaths on the days which closely correlated with flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing after DPT injections.

    The data on the time interval between the DPT injection and cot death in most of the seventy babies was taken from the published reports which concluded that there was no connection between DPT and cot death. The authors of these papers had little idea what they were looking at or what to look for. Most researchers arbitrarily accept that only deaths within 24 hours of administration of the vaccine can be attributed to the effect of the vaccine. Yet, babies may and do die for up to 25 or more days after vaccination, and still as a direct consequence of the toxic effects of the vaccines.

    How do we know this? Because of the observed repetition of the pattern of flare-ups of Stress-Induced

    Breathing in a number of babies over a long period of time.

    HARMFUL VACCINE INGREDIENTS

    What are the vaccines composed of?

    Vaccines contain live or ‘attenuated’ (weakened) viruses and bacteria or parts of them (representing foreign genetic material), animal tissue, formaldehyde and/or aluminium phosphate or hydroxide. The toxicity of vaccines varies widely and unpredictably, a DPT vaccine containing from 1 to 26.9 micrograms of endotoxin per millilitre. Geraghty and others in California tried unsuccessfully to make sure that the toxicity and composition of the vaccines is properly disclosed on the ampules.

    Injecting any of these substances into the blood stream of another animal species, including humans, is absolutely biologically unacceptable. H.L. Coulter in his book, Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: the Medical Assault on the American Brain, mentions that repeated injections of sterile extracts of rabbit brain tissue into monkeys cause an ‘experimental allergic encephalomyclitis’ in the monkeys. Regardless of the validity or otherwise of animal experiments for humans, Coulter points out that it is an observed fact that vaccine injections often cause the same syndrome in human babies. It has been confirmed that a great number of babies, if not all, suffer a clinical or subclinical encephalitis shortly after being injected with a variety of vaccines. Coulter talks about a postencephalitic syndrome.

    The great increase in a large array of brain-related conditions in the United States closely followed chronologically mandatory administration of vaccines en masse in that country.

    These conditions include autism, learning difficulties, cerebral palsy, dyslexia, hyperactivity, deafness and blindness, left-handedness (according to latest statistics, left-handed people live 9 years less than right-handed people) and permanent brain damage with serious and often life-long consequences.

    Vaccines by virtue of their composition act as noxious substances and elicit a response equivalent to the Non-Specific Stress Syndrome.

    Recently, we recorded the breathing of an infant injected with only DT (the P component was omitted because the baby had experienced a violent reaction to the two previous DPT injection). The reaction, as reflected in its breathing, closely resembled the record of its breathing after DPT vaccination. This is not meant to justify the inclusion of the Pertussis (Whooping Cough) component, but to emonstrate that all vaccines are potentially harmful.

    MANY DOCTORS DO NOT VACCINATE THEIR OWN CHILDREN!

    It should worry all of us that a large number of medical doctors are forcefully (by psychological pressure and publicity campaigns) without producing any evidence whatsoever of the benefits of vaccination and against all the evidence of the ineffectiveness and dangers of vaccines, injecting vaccines into our children. There are even noises indicating that soon the same forceful and unreasonable attitudes will be adopted towards adults.

    This is especially bad since it is a public secret that many medical doctors do not vaccinate their own children. This extraordinary fact is reported in DPT-A Shot in The Dark, by H.C. Coulter & B.L. Fisher. These authors also report that most gynaecologists in the USA refused to be injected with Rubella vaccine. Were they afraid of the side-effects, whilst routinely recommending the procedure for women of childbearing age?

    Our conclusion is that if vaccination were to be suspended, the cot death rate would be halved!

    What are the remainder of cot deaths attributed to?

    SUCCESSION OF HARMFUL MEDICAL PROCEDURES

    The Non-Specific Stress Syndrome is the key to cot deaths. It is the consistent, general reaction of mammals, including humans, to any damage or injury or to substances perceived as noxious by the recipient’s body. There are a great many injuries or substances perceived as noxious which affect babies and produce the same response.

    The indiscriminate and routine administration of pain killers during birth, and the substances used for inductions expose our babies to potent allopathic chemicals shortly before they are born. To say that these substances do not affect the babies is not only highly unscientific, it is against commonsense. Before babies have a chance to fully recover from these potent chemicals, they may be given nasal drops and cough mixtures and, and worse still, antibiotics for those first common colds.

    Most of these substances are immuno-suppressive and are not helping the child’s immune system to be primed and challenged in a natural and beneficial way by the common cold.

    Again, before a baby has a chance to fully recover from the effects of these potent chemicals, there is the first DPT injection. So the immature immune system of a baby is further suppressed, allowing micro-organisms to become especially virulent and life-threatening. This leads to further drug administration, a vicious circle, unfortunately too often resulting in cot death.

    The official figure of 2 cot deaths per 1,000 babies is twenty years old, and obsolete. The rate is more like 7-10 per 1,000, otherwise we would not even hear about cot death.

    Our records demonstrate that there is a direct causal relationship between injections of DPT and cot deaths. The time has come to call for suspension of all vaccination programmes.

    This article appeared in Nexus, Oct-Nov 1991.

    Reproduced with permission of Dr Scheibner, 178 Govetts Leap Rd, Blackheath NSW 2785, Australia. Fax: 61 (0) 2 4787 8988

    [Home] [Vaccines]

  2. Daisy Reply

    June 2, 2016 at 2:48 pm

    Kathy, mother of five. You are so right!
    I’d love to discuss more of this with you. Your children
    are blessed to have you as their mom.

  3. Mom of boys Reply

    June 2, 2016 at 7:39 am

    Cosleeping is given such a bad rap.
    If done properly the mom breathing in the babies face as long as she isn’t a smoker, drunk or on meds
    Can help a baby breathe and reduce apnea

  4. Kathy Reply

    June 2, 2016 at 6:47 am

    I am a licensed Physical Therapist of 20+ years and a mother of 5. I have a lot to say about this. First of all, human beings are designed by our great creator to be Cephalo-caudal in development. In other words, head to tail; meaning we are supposed to develop our neck extensors and capital neck flexors FIRST…you know when you put a newborn on their belly and they can clear their head to the side independently within about 1 week of birth…which btw any full term, normally developing infant that hasn’t been drugged up on vaccines CAN do. In 1994 the AAP started the whole back to sleep program. What a farce! Do you know why putting a baby on its back helps it to “not die” as much after the overload of vaccines recommended at the 2 month and 4 month “well-child” visits?? It’s called the startle reflex…again our great creator in HIs infinite wisdom saw to it that human babies are born with a number of automatic protective reflexes to PROTECT the baby until purposeful controlled movement was more established , the startle being one of them. So when these over-vaxxed babies are put on their backs and they stop breathing guess what?! The startle reflexes causes them to flail their arms and re start their breathing. Also in regards to development prior to “back to sleep” the norms for rolling in an infant were 2 to 4 months…that is now delayed as a whole.
    Now to the sleeping on the back issue…this has created another nightmare. Plagiocephaly, or flat misshapen head is now an ugly epidemic in any one born after 1994 if Mommy is not brave enough to go against doctor’s recommendations for “back” to sleep. When a baby does not spend a majority of his day on his tummy, his entire neuro-cognitive and muscular development is askew….leading to all sorts of coordination and even learning/reading problems down the road. I’m not sure how many characters I am allowed here, but if anyone wants further clarification just ask.

    • Theresa Reply

      June 2, 2016 at 6:03 pm

      Kathy, I loved learning everything you said. I’m assuming your 5 are unvaccinated?
      I hope you are a member of the FB group, Stop Mandatory Vaccinations. We need more medical professionals sharing this type of info for the edification of so very many parents who blindly trust their pediatricians. Thank you!

    • linda welton Reply

      June 4, 2016 at 7:09 am

      Japan has Fukushima, might not be a good choice!

    • Susan Reply

      June 6, 2016 at 10:52 pm

      Thank you! I am 72 years old and am totally in agreement with what you have expressed. God did not make a mistake in how the human body functions. Financial profit is behind the vaccination schedule, not health.

  5. Shannon Wood Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 10:34 pm

    I’m moving to Japan. This country puts profits ahead of lives. What’s going to happen when 1 in 3 kids has ASD and seizures?

  6. Shelley Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    In Japan, the number of cases of SIDS dropped drastically when they postponed immunizing children until two years of age.

  7. Rosech Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 9:46 am

    Also be aware that cow’s milk has been a toxic (poisonous) drink for anyone, but especially for infants and toddlers and has caused their deaths. This has been known since 1950
    that it is a killer and confirmed again in 1970 and both times by doctors. As a health consultant I counsel never ever give cow’s milk to anyone but especially to little ones. That, along with toxic vaccinations which many times have been proven ineffective, should be avoided in any way possible. I value NVIC because they work for us in spite of any administration’s forceful attempts to take over our lives and deaths!

    • Sarah Reply

      June 1, 2016 at 3:41 pm

      I too agree to never ever drink commercial milk (which in reality is no longer real milk). We adopted our nephew therefore I was unable to nurse. I made his formula with grassfed cows milk, recipe from theWestonAPricefoundation.com website I’m very happy to say he is incredibly healthy. We must do our research people! It’s all out there!

    • Melissa Reply

      June 1, 2016 at 8:49 pm

      Toxic is a bit overblown. Toxic for some perhaps. I’m a nutritionist, and highly recommend raw cow’s milk to people who are not sensitive to milk. I have several clients who have gained great strength and health drinking it. Pasteurized milk is terrible, I would agree with you there. But raw milk is a very nutritious food for those who have the digestive enzymes for it. Anecdotal, I know, but I have a son who thrived on it when my milk supply dried up prematurely. He is very smart, very healthy, and has a strong muscular body.

      All foods can be toxic for some. Well sourced raw cow’s milk is not toxic for all.

    • Wrusssr Reply

      June 2, 2016 at 2:14 pm

      Links, please, for your assertions about fresh milk being unhealthy infants and toddlers.

  8. Gale Keppel Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 8:38 am

    No, Bruce Simmons. Your question denotes that would be the logical step; however, the CDC and the NIH are against that type of research. They have their excuses. Personally, I think they already know the answer to that one and they might have to admit that they are wrong.

  9. Michelle Mandolf Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 8:30 am

    Send all these SIDS babies to a pathologist! It is a LIE that cause is unknown & such a mystery, at least in most cases. How simple would this be? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist, a pathologist is able to the tragic analysis.

  10. Shawn Siegel Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 8:11 am

    Kids don’t have to be born with brain abnormalities – Health and Human Services in their Vaccine Injury
    Table lists both the pertussis-containing and MMR vaccines as causing encephalopathy – brain damage – and as individual shots, not necessarily in combination with others. The DTaP’s administered at two, four and six months. The possibility, if not the likelihood, that the vast majority of those 3,434 annual SUIDs in the U.S. are caused by vaccines is glaringly obvious.

  11. Janem1276 Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 8:08 am

    SIDS has been well documented for at least 2000 years of human history. As far as the statistics now, more SIDS cases occur in African Americans as they are less likely to put their babies in safe sleep environments, i.e., more likely to cosleep. Multiple investigations into the cause of SIDS/SUIDS deaths show at least 90% of them occur due to unsafe sleep practices.

    http://www.npr.org/2011/07/15/137859024/rethinking-sids-many-deaths-no-longer-a-mystery

    http://www.scienceclarified.com/Sp-Th/Sudden-Infant-Death-Syndrome-SIDS.html

    • Sarah Reply

      June 1, 2016 at 3:31 pm

      It’s a bit suspicious to say the least!! why African American babies?? Eugenics?? Hmm cleansing of the ?? Don’t blindly trust anyone injecting anything into yours & your children’s bodies!! Foolishness

    • Melissa Reply

      June 1, 2016 at 8:41 pm

      There are many countries world wide where SIDS is very low, but families cosleep.

    • Sara Reply

      June 2, 2016 at 7:01 am

      SIDS is not linked to co-sleeping. Countries where co-sleeping is common do not have an increased risk of SIDS. And where is this data that African Americans are more likely to co-sleep anyway? What is that based on?
      http://cosleeping.nd.edu/assets/32946/new_knowledge_new_insights_and_new_recommendations_2003.pdf

    • rene Reply

      June 2, 2016 at 11:36 am

      NPR and blogs are not scientifically recognised. Co-sleeping is not the same as letting your baby sleep where is wants or bc the parent may be drinking etc. Co-sleeping countries have low rates of SIDS. Bottom line is studies need to be conducted on Vaccine safety by an independent scientific body, not CDC, not Pharma science.

      • james pilipchuk Reply

        June 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm

        amen

  12. Davin Emerson Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 7:15 am

    I came across this discovery back in the 90’s that I believe has more weight than any thing else that I have researched.

    “The Mattress Connection

    Many ideas have been proposed to explain SIDS, but none has been comprehensive or convincing until the theory presented by Barry Richardson, a British expert in materials degradation. His theory was validated by the research of Dr. T. James Sprott, a New Zealand chemist and forensic scientist.”

    Richardson points out the vaccines are indirectly having an affect.

    Do your research yourself and see what you think.
    Davin

  13. Bruce Simmons Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 6:56 am

    Have there been any studies comparing the rate of SIDS in vaccinated versus unvaccinated babies?

    • mark brody Reply

      June 1, 2016 at 12:45 pm

      Not that I am aware of. But you can be sure that the vaccine industry is hardly pursuing these studies and the CDC would be most eager to suppress them or discredit them if they were done. Still, doing a double blind study with sham vaccines vs. real vaccines would certainly be the study to do. Now, try getting someone to do it. Dr. Wakefield are you listening?

    • May Reply

      June 2, 2016 at 12:53 pm

      They will NEVER do that because it would PROVE to all of us that the vaccines are KILLING the babies!! :(

  14. Bozewell Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 6:27 am

    I find it unbelievable that anyone would believe it is okay to inject anything into a baby whose immune system is in the developing stage, let alone injecting something that has been proven decades ago to be harmful but is now okay because it has been processed or combined with other ingredients.

  15. Jo Reply

    June 1, 2016 at 6:10 am

    So, if the occurrence of crib death or SIDS went on the upswing when the vaccine schedule increased in the 1960s, you’d have to be a mental midget not to make the correlation.
    Of course, ‘the experts’ don’t give a rat’s behind about your children because their jobs depend on maintaining the bureaucracies in power. Those same bureaucracies implement the U.N. and W.H.O agendas. Those agendas primarily have to do with population control. Population ‘control’ means depopulation, because those who own and run nations aren’t happy with too many of YOUR type. And in the brave new world we are in, they don’t need as many of YOUR type.
    Lets add 2+2 (not using the new math) and arrive at 4, shall we?

    • james pilipchuk Reply

      June 6, 2016 at 12:06 pm

      i agree fully

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>