“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Front Page » Vaccination » Risk & Failure Reports » Girl’s Ovaries Destroyed by Gardasil: Merck Did Not Research Effects of Vaccine on Female Reproduction
Risk & Failure Reports
Text size:

Girl’s Ovaries Destroyed by Gardasil: Merck Did Not Research Effects of Vaccine on Female Reproduction

woman's hands over ovaries

Adverse effects have been reported around the world, and they are, according to many experts, like Dr. Diane Harper, far more common than what we are made to believe through the literature.

When one looks at the independent literature, so, studies which are not sponsored by the vaccine manufactures… with relation to Gardasil, there have been several reports documenting multiple sclerosis and encephalitis,1 which is brain inflammation, in girls who have received their Gardasil vaccine. So, just because a study sponsored by the manufactures does not identify problems with the vaccine, does not necessarily mean that the vaccine is safe. In fact if one looks at the manufacturer studies, they’re often not designed to detect serious adverse events.2

The quote above comes from Dr. Lucija Tomlinjenovic, a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of British Colombia. She’s published many papers on the efficacy and safety of HPV vaccines.

It’s a great quote to start this article with, because multiple studies have identified the fact that the studies used to approve this vaccine do not look for serious adverse effects. As a result, many young women have experienced drastic and debilitating changes after receiving the HPV vaccine. In rare cases it has even caused death.

One example comes from a study3 published in the British Medical Journal titled “Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination.” The study highlights an obvious fact, that “preservation of reproductive health is a primary concern in the recipient target group.” It is therefore ironic that the demonstration of ongoing and uncompromised safety for the ovary is, as the study points out, an “urgently required” need. You would think that the vaccine manufactures would look into this before approving it as completely safe. The abstract concludes by stating that “this matter needs to be resolved for the purposes of population health and public vaccine confidence.”

The main case in this study determined that, prior to the shots, the girl had healthy ovaries, and that there were no other identified factors besides Gardasil that could have been involved in her sudden sickness.

Another study conducted two years later by the same author documents three young women who developed premature ovarian insufficiency following quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination presented to a general practitioner in rural New South Wales, Australia.

The study points out how…

further studies are required to make any claims of ovary complications. Principles of informed consent, population health, and vaccine confidence require careful, rigorous and independent research to establish ovarian safety following HPV.

This information alone warrants further studies, and this is exactly what the corporation avoids. They do not want to look for or conduct studies that link the HPV vaccine to such a major issue like ovarian failure, no matter how rare it is. It really puts into question whether or not it’s even worth vaccinating your child with the HPV vaccine.

Adverse effects have been reported around the world, and they are, according to many experts, like Dr. Diane Harper, far more common than what we are made to believe through the literature.

As a result of all these complications and reports of young girls who’ve had their lives destroyed, the American College of Paediatrics put out a statement regarding the matter last year:

It has recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause. There have been two case report series (3 cases each) published since 2013 in which post-menarcheal adolescent girls developed laboratory documented POF within weeks to several years of receiving Gardasil, a four-strain human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV4).

The document pointed out something that should have been addressed before this vaccine was administered en masse. Firstly, long term ovarian function was not assessed in either the original rat safety studies or the human vaccine trials. Secondly, most primary care physicians remain unaware of a possible association between HPV4 and POF and may not consider reporting POF cases or prolonged missing menstrual periods to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Thirdly, potential mechanisms of action have been postulated based on autoimmune associations with the aluminum adjuvant used and previously documented ovarian toxicity in rats from another component, polysorbate 80. Lastly, it emphasized that, since licensure of Gardasil in 2006, there have been about 213 VAERS reports involving amenorrhea, POF or premature menopause, 88% of which have been associated with Gardasil.4

Another study published in the journal Pediatrics5 found that many paediatricians don’t strongly recommend the HPV vaccine. It found that a large percentage of pediatricians and family doctors—nearly one third of those surveyed—are not strongly recommending the HPV vaccine to parents and preteens, which is why, as illustrated by the study, HPV vaccination rates continue to drop.

Prior to this, another study was published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology in 2015. Written by Melissa B. Gilkey, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, the study was designed to assess how physicians recommend the HPV vaccine. The authors were surprised to find that…

physicians so often reported recommending HPV vaccination inconsistently, behind schedule, or without urgency. Of the five communication practices we assessed, about half of physicians reported two or more practices that likely discourage timely HPV vaccination.6

This study found that 27% of physicians across the United States do not strongly endorse HPV vaccination, and 26% do not give the vaccinations to girls on time as recommended. Approximately 59% of physicians recommended it for adolescents.


Note: This article was reprinted with the author’s permission. It was originally published by Collective Evolution.

References:

1 Sekiguchi K, Yasui N, Kowa H, Kanda F, Toda T.  Two Cases of Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Following Vaccination Against Human Papilloma Virus. Intern Med 2016 Nov. 1, 2016; 55(21): 3181–3184.
2 Dr. Lucija Tomlijenovic: Adverse Reaction Studies—One More Girl Excerpts. YouTube May 2, 2014 (published).
3 Little DT, Grenville Ward HR. Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination. BMJ Case Reports  2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-006879.
4 New Concerns about the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. American College of Pediatricians January 2016.
5 Allison MA, Hurley LP, Markowitz L, Crane LA, Brtnikova M, Beaty BL, Snow M, Cory J, Stokley S, Roark J, Kempe A. Primary Care Physicians’ Perspectives About HPV Vaccine. Pediatrics January 2016.
6 Many U.S. Physicians Communicate With Parents in Ways That May Discourage HPV Vaccination. American Association for Cancer Research Oct. 22, 2015.

13 Responses to Girl’s Ovaries Destroyed by Gardasil: Merck Did Not Research Effects of Vaccine on Female Reproduction

  1. Amy Murphy Reply

    May 23, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    Also, re Gerberding and moving seamlessly over to Merck from the CDC? Just Google it; all there, “in black and white,” and no different than other such “career moves” in the history of Big Pharma/CDC revolving door; outrageous, disturbing, but very much the norm.

  2. Amy Murphy Reply

    May 23, 2017 at 3:37 pm

    Re the Colorado higher ed problem: I thought that Colorado adhered to a philosophical exemption, no? My heart goes out to your wife; my mom became an RN in the 1940’s (now aged 96) and refused all vaccinations after the age of 23; before that, she had acquiesced — and has always regretted it.

  3. RICHARD L. BRANDON, MD Reply

    April 18, 2017 at 11:19 am

    When Merck submitted Gardasil for approval by the CDC, the committee looking at it recommended not approving it. But, CDC Head Julie Gerberding over-ruled their recommendation. She was later hired as Head of Merck’s Vaccine Dept, with a salary 10 times her CDC salary of $150,000. Then she cashed in millions of dollars woth of Merck stock. Go figure.

    • Ethan Reply

      May 5, 2017 at 7:25 pm

      You mentioned that originally the vaccine was voted on to not be approved and that she overruled the decision . Can you cite a source that has the recommendations? I’d like to have the info for a paper.

      Thanks

  4. Colorado Reply

    April 17, 2017 at 8:03 am

    It’s about time we re examine our thought process, pertaining to vaccine manufacturers. We all operate as if at least someone working there actually cares, and actually takes the safety arguments seriously, at least in some regard. We argue they did not perform due diligence, etc. How about we call it like it is; The manufactures of vaccines don’t give a damn, and the create a dialogue to fit the sales of their product, long before they ever test the product for safety.
    This particular shot is the reason my wife cannot elevate her career to an LPN or RN, and has to choose to be a low level MA for life, or find a new line of work. You can not get into school anywhere in the state of CO, without risking your life taking this shot. That’s one effective way to weed out the opposition, I’ll tell you what. We are actively discriminated against in both school and employment, for not accepting vaccinations.

    • ConfuzedinFL Reply

      April 20, 2017 at 8:32 pm

      Why would nursing students be required to get a vaccine for a sexually transmitted virus to get into nursing school? The flu shot, tb test, testing for communicable diseases, all that I ununderstand. But it isnt like nurses are sexually active with their patients…that just makes no sense at all.

      • Colorado Reply

        May 23, 2017 at 9:01 am

        ConfusedInFL, exactly. Thanks to all the Colorado educational institutions for not offering vaccination opt outs for various medical schooling. Great job guys, excellent use of discriminatory policy. If anyone knows of a way to get through this, please respond. If there is a legal opt out like for kids and school, we need to know about it. We’re able to send the kids to school and can maintain these rights, not having to vaccinate. But the same is apparently not true for adults, even at public institutions. It’s a double standard for sure. For the record my wife is currently employed at a major hospital and has been told she will land an elevated placement after more education, she’s clearly exceeding expectations over a long term. If she was going to have a problem with patients and disease, that would have already happened. Perhaps we could force our way into RN school via a lawsuit? Sounds just so risky though, as our goal is to increase our financial position, not compromise it going against corrupt institutions and policies in a court setting. This is what tyranny looks like. This is what discrimination feels like. This is what the founding fathers warned us about. Where are the patriots, where is the emphasis on liberty? How did major pharmaceutical corporations become above the law and in control of our personal liberties?

  5. Camille Reply

    April 14, 2017 at 5:44 pm

    Is HPV contracted through sexual intimacy only or are there other ways?

    • Eileen Reply

      April 17, 2017 at 10:13 am

      yes this type of virus is transmitted sexually..however this vaccine is not only poisonous it does not address this virus which comes in about 100 forms…so three forms does nothing even if the vaccine were not dangerous which it is..

      • Colorado Reply

        May 23, 2017 at 8:50 am

        Eileen, thank you for that shocking, but necessary piece of information. This whole thing is about covering a 3% range?!? OMG, vaccinations just keep getting better and better.

  6. Num Guy Reply

    April 14, 2017 at 4:39 pm

    How many more lives have to be destroyed before the truth comes out? We need a tobacco type of law suit against vaccine makers. But wait! We in America cannot sue vaccine makers because our corrupt congress has shielded them against all lawsuits since 1986.

    If you want to change things, this law must go. Please sign the petition at

    http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/repeal-immunity-for-drug

    and share with everyone you know.

    Together, we can overcome!!

    • Colorado Reply

      May 23, 2017 at 9:16 am

      An infinite amount NumGuy, an infinite amount. There is no limit to how many people must die in the name of big pharmaceutical profits, because there is no ethic from these companies in the first place. Obviously they have failed at self policing, having a lengthy list of propaganda and exposure to prove that. The power of the purse and the power of free markets is the only effective long term solution stop this sort of financially motivated tyranny. I detailed these points in the other articles which came out just shortly after this, ‘immunocompromised’ and ‘notorious’. Very lengthy responses so I won’t re state that here. Basically the Sherman Anti Trust act is supposed to have prevented this sort of market monopoly and usurpation of standard liberty. If people had to pay cash out of pocket for shots, opt out rates would climb dramatically. This is collusion between insurers, vaccine manufacturers, hospitals, government persons, and lobbyists. These are crimes that deserve imprisonment for many high level persons who have forced the consumers position pertaining to these policies and products.

  7. CD Reply

    April 14, 2017 at 4:17 pm

    With the CDC and doctors also pushing the HPV vaccine on boys, I would be curious to see how the boys are being effected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>